Bifurcation (law)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please improve this article or discuss the issue on the talk page. |
| This article does not cite any references or sources. (December 2006) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
In law, bifurcation is a judge's ability to divide a trial into two parts so as to render a judgment on a set of legal issues without looking at all aspects. Frequently, civil cases are bifurcated into separate liability and damages proceedings. Criminal trials are also often bifurcated into guilt and sentencing phases, particularly in capital cases.
[edit] Bifurcation Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Under the American Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 42(b) allows the court to decide issues contained in a single suit in separate trials. Bifurcation does not affect the party structure of the suit itself, but merely allows multiple trials inside of one suit. Conversely, the court may allow combination, which permits two separate suits to be joined together in a single trial. This is done through Rule 42(a).
Bifurcation is distinctly different than severance, which under Rule 21 creates separate suits. The practical distinction is that severance results in separate judgments, whereas bifurcation yields a single judgment.
For example: A judge may accept bifurcation in a divorce case where the issues of custody and property division are bifurcated. This way they can both be discussed at the same time but separately.
In Federal Court judges have wide discretion to structure trials. Factors evaluated will include congruence of issues, complexity for the jury, and possible prejudice to any of the parties.
[edit] Bifurcation under state procedure
State procedures differ widely.
In some states, a defendant who has raised the defense of mental disease or defect will automatically create a bifurcated trial. In the first part, a defendant's guilt or innocence is decided. If the defendant is guilty, the issue of mental disease is presented.

