Talk:Bhagwan Dashairya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

I have created this stub because, it is in the spirit of Wikipedia's "Neutral Point of View" to include all of the qualified candidates who run in a general election. At the very least, a directory, (with basic information), of Michigan politicians should contain biographical information on the five politicians who ran for Michigan's highest office. If any Michigan politicians (in addition to those who are elected) are notable, it is they.

I have included the reason for interest (Candidate for Governor in general election), and an unambiguous identifier (birth date). I have also included a few links. This should be enough lead information from which to locate additional sources and compose an article. --Libertyguy 00:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Odd lines

What's up with the line "My jobs were in the back room under the Professors." in the section Running mate: Carl Oehling? 209.124.36.219 (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC).

It looks like unrelated content was pasted into that section when the editor added that section. I did a yahoo search for that phrases exact wording and only one page came up: [1]

So it looks like the other editor was using this as a source and pasted that wording in there rather than transposing content into the proper encyclopedic prose.--Redandready (talk) 19:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)