Talk:Beyond intelligent design
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by the Intelligent design WikiProject.
This project provides a central approach to Intelligent design-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
[edit] OR Criticism section removed
I have removed the criticism section, since it seems to be someone's own personal views on the matter. When these criticisms are verifiable in reliable sources, then they can be added back to the text. silly rabbit (talk) 16:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Criticism
Mulder does not seem aware of the copious volumes of scientific evidence against creationism or intelligent design. His arguments hinge on reliance on the Bible as the only true and correct authority. Mulder claims that the conclusions he draws based on Biblical texts are science. Mulder also does not seem to have any understanding of the Wedge Strategy or the reason that the Discovery Institute is championing intelligent design rather than creationism or creation science.[neutrality disputed]
