Beverton-Holt model
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Beverton–Holt model is a classic discrete-time population model which gives the expected number (or density) of individuals nt + 1 in generation t + 1 as a function of the number of individuals in the previous generation,
Here R0 is interpreted as the proliferation rate per generation and K = (R0 − 1)M is the carrying capacity of the environment. The Beverton–Holt model was introduced in the context of fisheries by Beverton & Holt (1957). Subsequent work has derived the model under other assumptions such as contest competition (Brännström & Sumpter 2005) or within-year resource limited competition (Geritz & Kisdi 2004). The Beverton–Holt model can be generalized to include scramble competition (see the Ricker model, the Hassell model and the Maynard Smith–Slatkin model). It is also possible to include a parameter reflecting the spatial clustering of individuals (see Brännström & Sumpter 2005).
Despite being nonlinear, the model can be solved explicitly, since it is in fact an inhomogeneous linear equation in 1 / n. The solution is
Because of this structure, the model can be considered as the discrete-time analogue of the continuous-time logistic equation for population growth introduced by Verhulst; for comparison, the logistic equation is dN / dt = rN(1 − N / K), and its solution is
[edit] References
- Beverton, R. J. H. & Holt, S. J. (1957), On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations, Fishery Investigations Series II Volume XIX, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
- Brännström, Åke & Sumpter, David J. T. (2005), “The role of competition and clustering in population dynamics”, Proc. R. Soc. B 272 (1576): 2065–2072, doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3185, <http://www.math.uu.se/~david/web/BrannstromSumpter05a.pdf>
- Geritz, Stefan A. H. & Kisdi, Éva (2004), “On the mechanistic underpinning of discrete-time population models with complex dynamics”, J. Theor. Biol. 228 (2): 261–269, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.01.003
- Ricker, W. E. (1954), “Stock and recruitment”, J. Fisheries Res. Board Can. 11: 559–623




