Talk:Better Business Bureau
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. |
| Start | rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale |
| Low | rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale |
 |
This article is being improved by WikiProject Rational Skepticism. Wikiproject Rational Skepticism seeks to improve the quality of articles dealing with science, pseudosciences, pseudohistory and skepticism. Please feel free to help us improve this page. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
Contents |
[edit] The Article is Biased
I find the words and tone in this article to be biased. It appears to be promoting and advertising the Better Business Bureau. From the very first sentence -- which I have since edited -- there is a bias. The first sentence of the last revision (before my edit) read, "The Better Business Bureau, founded in 1912, is an organization based in the United States and Canada devoted to honest business."
Even the so-called "Criticisms" section is biased towards promoting the BBB.
This type of bias seems to run rampant through the article. I was prepared to run right along with it in an attempt to neutralize the article -- but came to this discussion page first for comments. (Wiki writer 17:48, 17 June 2006 (UTC))
[edit] Criticisms
There is really no need to water down the criticisms; they are well known criticism of the BBB -- or to add statements that turn the "Criticisms" section into a forum for debate. If you have statements regarding the actions or performance of the BBB that are not criticisms, then maybe put them in the related section. Or start another section. Wiki writer 06:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok -- the anonymous BBB representative is deleting items from the criticism section again. It has become tiring, so for the time being I am going to save these criticisms right here. If there is no discussion explaining why these were removed -- I will just go ahead and put them back in the article.
- Their method of dispute resolution is also dubious, as a simple acknowledgement of a complaint is enough to consider the matter resolved.
- Also of note, not all industries or companies are handled. Some companies and professions the BBB won't take complaints against include real estate firms, public utilities, and physicians.
Wiki writer 07:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Once again --- our anonymous BBB rep has decided to take it upon himself to shine up the BBB image by deleting criticism. I have included the deletions here.
- Their method of dispute resolution is also dubious, as a simple acknowledgement of a complaint is enough to consider the matter resolved.Wiki writer 00:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Please remember that the BBB is a FRANCHISE and benefits from sales of memberships and advertising in it's registries. They cannot be an impartial third party in a dispute if they are taking money from their members. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.36.61 (talk) 20:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unfair Critisms
I think this section should be deleted because something writen in NPOV can not be considered Fair or Unfair--141.153.188.101 14:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I agree - One or two editors seem determined to make this look like a BBB advertising brochure. An article about the BBB is difficult to keep objective. Making arbitrary deletions and adding obviously biased information is not going to help. The best place to discuss these issues (before the edits) is this discussion page or the article will not progress. Wiki writer 07:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
The only thing biased is the BBB itself. They have a long standing track record of not resolving complaints against non-member companys, while those who PAY the subscription (remember this is supposed to be a charity, not a business in itself [which it is]) can have complaints resolved by a simple email or phone call. The BBB has "certified" MANY border-line scams, including blatant multi level marketing ploys. The only reason they're still in BUSINESS (they should never have been classified as non-profit) is because their name fools the average person into thinking they're a credible authority. In reality they're no different than the "100% beef" company contracted by McDonalds. 17:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.152.224.206 (talk)
[edit] Better Business Bureau
The Better Business Bureau was founded in part by Al Capone. If you follow the link within the existing article (http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/ripoff1343.htm), it says that. It also says it on this link. http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php/_v257/__show_article/_a000257-000013.htm Shuim 15:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- I reverted this partly because Al Capone was only 13 years old in 1912, that was the first tipoff. I suggest taking a look at WP:Reliable sources. I like reading Ripoff Report too, but a side observation in some anonymous victim's complaint isn't a reliable source; nor is the anonymous item in your second citation, apparently someone's blog. My edit summary said "revert unsourced statement" to be polite; I hope the next reverter is as nice. --CliffC 16:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Understanding a business reliability report
Text is needed to describe a Business Reliability Report which is one of the main products of the BBB.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BetterBusinessBureau.gif
Image:BetterBusinessBureau.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Opinion Moved from Article
Moved the following from the main page, as it is not encyclopedic Icemotoboy (talk) 00:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC):
The Better Business Bureau is normally used by consumers as a means to extort money or services from businesses. Consumers regularly threaten a business with a bad profile unless they pay up. Unfortunately the nation's Anti-Slapp laws tend to protect the BBB in their extortionary endeavors as they mask themselves in the glow of consumer protectionism.
Officially a non-profit the BBB makes a considerable amount of money for its presidents. The Los Angeles chapter long time head in charge, William G. Mitchell, has been reported to make in excess of $220,000 for his non-profit each year since the late 1990s. He has also been accused of misappropriation of funds, fraud, false, inaccurate, and libelous reports and has been accused of actually selling “Good Reports” to firms with dubious dealings. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/001/RipOff0001343.htm is a website that deals with the Bad Business Bureau.
-several grammatical errors corrected, though not corrected for content!-
