Talk:Betrayal in Antara
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
Is it really a sequel? To quote wiktionary: "Narratology. A narrative that is written after another narrative set in the same universe, especially a narrative that is chronologically set after its predecessors."
It's hardly set in the same universe, even the article admits that. Should that be cleared up?
"Betrayal in Antara was poorly received by fans of Krondor for a variety of reasons." The article only lists one: That they had to make up a new world.
"...and crashed regularly." Removed this; it hardly ever/never crashed when either I or my dad played it on a Windows 95/98, and we played it very often sometimes.
Also, the article seems to talk more about the bad points of the game than the game itself, or the good points (like the decent storyline and believable characters). Starlight4ever 20:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Starlight, this article is too negative. The game had some bad points (it kept crashing during the last chapter), but it had an interesting story, good characters and a well-detailed world (much more original and interesting than Midkemia, in my opinion). It was linear, but no more than most computer games. (Baldric - 22/06/07)
