From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thank you for experimenting with the page Chinese people on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. bibliomaniac15 Hey you! Stop lazing around and help fix this article instead! 20:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] April 2008
The recent edit you made to Tibetan Buddhism constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 20:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC))
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Ksyrie. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Thingg⊕⊗ 20:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jacqui Smith. J.delanoygabsadds 21:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not make personal attacks on other editors, as you did here [1]. That didn't fool anyone. Redrocket (talk) 10:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
You have been
blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with
Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for
vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may
contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|
your reason here}} below.
NawlinWiki (talk) 15:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: " After taking a leave of abscence from Wikipedia, I decided to read the policies. I now understand why my edits were disruptive per wp:SOAP. My political idealogies have no place on wikipedia because another core policy states having a neutral point of view. I should also comment on content rather than contributors per wp:personal attacks. I feel after reading the policies through that I can now make meaningful contributions. I have a few Ideas. Such as for the hiccup article I can add references for the section on home remedies. I will add Wikilinks to the Steve Stevens article and try to integrate the trivia section into allready existing sections."
Decline reason: "Looking at Special:Contributions/Benitothedon, I find that somewhat hard to believe. -- Netsnipe ► 17:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
