User talk:Beingcited

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Aballister Bonaduce. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Mayalld 21:58, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Aballister Bonaduce. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Mayalld 22:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

The fact that text has been used elsewhere does NOT preclude the deletion of the article from en.wikipedia Mayalld 22:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Aballister Bonaduce, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mayalld 22:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

The article is being considered for deletion on the AfD for Cadderly Bonaduce, as is shown in the AfD tag that you persist in removing. Mayalld 22:09, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


Blocked as a vandal account. Academic Challenger 22:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was reverting deletionist scum who are attempting to ruin Wikipedia."

Decline reason: "The proper way to try to keep the article would have been to discuss it on the AFD page. — Mr.Z-man 05:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I was turning it into a redirect. Surely redirecting something is almost the same as deleting it?

So why not leave the process to run its course? Odd that you should claim that youe were effectively deleting it, when your unblock request talks about "deletionist scum"Mayalld 07:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)