Talk:Bedell Covered Bridge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

Project New Hampshire     (Rated Stub-Class) This article is part of Project New Hampshire; an effort to create, expand, and improve New Hampshire-related articles to a feature-quality standard. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as low-priority on the priority scale. WikiProject Vermont      (Rated Stub-Class) This article is part of Project Vermont, an effort to create, expand, and improve Vermont-related articles to a feature-quality standard. All Wikipedians are encouraged to join the project and help in any way they can. Vermont Portal Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. WikiProject Bridges     (Rated Stub-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges, a WikiProject which aims to expand coverage of bridges on Wikipedia. Please feel free to join us. Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments) ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. National Register of Historic Places WikiProject (Rated stub-Class) This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places. Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] I don't think they'll try again

It seems to me that if you don't succeed the first five times, perhaps it's not a good idea to try again. - Denimadept 01:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Which category makes more sense?

I've currently got the article in both Bridge disasters and Demolished bridges. In all cases, this bridge seemed to come down due to natural causes, not man-made, which makes me think that the "disaster" label is more appropriate. Still, it seems to me to be a bit of an overstatement to call it a "disaster". What makes sense? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denimadept (talk • contribs) 01:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

I suggest disasters. Demolished bridges is for bridges that were deliberately taken down by man. -- Kvetner 16:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. Over-stated or not, I suspect it was a disaster to those who wanted to have the bridge there. - Denimadept 16:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Photos?

You want photos of a bridge which isn't there? Okay... - Denimadept (talk) 03:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Better now? - Denimadept (talk) 04:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)