Talk:Be@rbrick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Let's leave good articles alone. Please.

Dear Terraxos, who added the "Primary Sources" template: This article or section does not need sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications. Consider the word meaning of the word need. This article doesn't truly need anything, and that's all right; not every article has go through nine thousand drafts before it accomplishes what a good article should. This one is good as it is. Perhaps then, the thing to do is to leave it alone, instead of sticking a template on it, and going on your way. This article contains facts, and only facts, regarding Be@rbricks. There's no (genuine) need for third-party verification. And, while primary sources and sources affiliated with the subject of this article are generally not sufficient for a Wikipedia article, in this instance, that simply doesn't apply here. There's no (genuine) need to include more appropriate citations from reliable sources. The "Primary Sources" template suggests the alternative of discussing the issue on the Talk Page, but I can't imagine what else there would be to say. Let's leave good articles alone. Please.