Talk:Bayh-Dole Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

⚖
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
??? This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale.
This article may be too technical for a general audience.
Please help improve this article by providing more context and better explanations of technical details to make it more accessible, without removing technical details.
  • What does it mean "to retain title first"? Can somebody try to phrase this for the rest of us? 169.237.5.137 02:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Additionally, I think it is not a rounded encyclopedia article at all. I completely miss the "critique" section. And there is quite some critique about enabling academia to get knowledge patented! But, and I agree with the previous post, it is too legalese/technical and currently not in a shape that would make a "critique" section fit in easily. Madmaxx 22:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Links for notes 4 and 5 are broken. Also, dates for the NIH decisions would be helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.193.180.45 (talk) 20:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your note. I have fixed the broken links. --Edcolins (talk) 20:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)