From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
|
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
"In 2005, Q magazine included "Batdance" in a list of "Ten Terrible Records by Great Artists", even though Q gave the whole album 5 stars when first reviewed."
I'm removing this because it's a silly, shallow criticize from an obviously inconsistent music magazine; I don't consider listing "Ten Terrible Records by Great Artists" to be good or interesting--or even notable or popular--music writing and it's definately not significant or objective enough to included here. Proclaiming records as "terrible" in little lists in magazines is ridiculous to begin with, but adding them to encyclopedias just annoys me intensely. Where is the relevance to the article? Some (bad) music critics think the song is "terrible"; what does this tell us about the song? Nothing.