User talk:Barnstormer1000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Barnstormer1000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --Ronz 03:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Movement to impeach George W. Bush

You've joined a rather heated discussion. Your perspective is welcome, but please try to focus on the article and how to make the it better. Comments such as "Many of the comments here, especially from Blue Tie are not only absurd, they are bizzare" might be taken poorly by other editors, especially ones you name. You've made some good points, and I don't want editors focusing on how you made them but rather what you've actually written.

WP:CIVIL and WP:TALK contain more information that's especially helpful when contributing to such heated discussions. --Ronz 04:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made to Movement to impeach George W. Bush

Your edits are regarded as disruptive and you have been reverted by multiple editors. If you continue in this manner, you will soon find your account blocked from editing. Before making such drastic edits again, please seek consensus on the talk page. - auburnpilot talk 06:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. FreedomAintFree 06:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Because you clearly have no intentions of editing Wikipedia for the benefit of the project or with the community's input, you have been block indefinitely for disruption. You were warned, asked to stop, and you continued. - auburnpilot talk 06:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)