Talk:Barrie Zwicker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 February 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Edited this article to make the point that Zwicker was the first person from the mainstream to publicly draw attention to the gaping flaws in the 'official 911 conspiracy theory.' If evidence can be supplied to contradict this point, please annote your edit. ---Odysseus, 2006 August 25th 19:42 UTC.

I dare you, delete this guys non-notable! --Striver 19:24, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

No ADF yet? C'mon, i need to expand Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Conspiracies_Guild#AFD.27s... --Striver 02:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

There you go, i knew you couldnt stand it: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrie Zwicker. I mean, he is a conspiracst, and we cant have that on WP, can we? we can have pedofiles, UFologists, new age moron, child molesters. but good heavens, NOT A CONSPIRASITS! --Striver 17:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Sorry guys, the man is a well known journalist and as such has his place here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shane-m (talk • contribs) .

For all of you out there, Barrie Zwicker is my great uncle, and for this page of information to be taken away may very well be compared to burning a book. When a library runs out of space to contain the knowledge that it holds, the books are not simply cast out, alternative means are found to contain the knowledge. And to address him as a conspiracst is to take a side in the issue, for which you yourself are judging him for. As jesus himself would say, take the rafter out of your own eye before you attept to pluck the strand of straw from you brothers. An encyclopedias job is to present the facts, and let the readers evaluate and gleem their own interpretation. So how about you do you job, and we the people shall do ours. - Ben Muzzell