Talk:Barrick Nealy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is part of WikiProject National Football League, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 26 February 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] Barrick Nealy is a keeper

I noticed that the discussion recently was to delete this article. When I search Vince Young it says that his article is part of a Wikipedia Project on UT of Austin. So how do we get a Project for Texas State??? This man, Barrick Nealy not only was a huge part of the school, but is a player that broke school records left and right and took the school to new heights. When he becomes the next Tom Brady ( a late round draft pick ..round 6 pick number 199) will he then be acceptable to all of you who vote to delete him???? UT is not the only school in the area and it should not be treated as such. While Texas State may not be as big or as high profile we are just as important. Need more info...check out the recent Princeton Review!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.176.162 (talk • contribs)

The decision was to keep the article, in part because he was conference player of the year. Thanks for your additions; hopefully others will follow suit. -Colin Kimbrell 17:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)