Talk:Balkan Communist Federation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Sources
- Georgi Dimitrov - The Significance of the Second Balkan Conference (1915)
- Georgi Dimitrov's Political Report to the V Congress of the Bulgarian Communist Party (1948)
- FrancisTyers · 15:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- This short outline cannot hope to indicate the richness of the material that Rothschild presents, not only on Bulgarian communism, but on the Macedonian nationalists, the Peasant Union, the Socialists, the Balkan Socialist Federation and its Communist successor, and the Comintern as well.
- In plunging into what is virtually a history of Bulgarian domestic politics during the critical years 1918-1925, Rothschild has followed a peculiar scheme of organization that singles out certain political groups (the Communists, the Peasant Unionists, and the various irredentist organizations -- the Macedonians in particular) and describes them consecutively...
Leonard Bushkoff (1963) "Review: Revolution and Nationalism: Two Studies on the History of Communism in Eastern Europe" in World Politics © 1963 The Johns Hopkins University Press
Other interesting articles:
- L. S. Stavrianos "The Balkan Federation Movement A Neglected Aspect" in The American Historical Review, Vol. 48, No. 1. (Oct., 1942), pp. 30-51.
- FrancisTyers · 22:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
"To my astonishment I was told that Stambolinski already had instructions in Paris to make such a proposal. The offer included the demand that Macedonia, which is neither Greek, Serbian, nor Bulgarian, be erected into a little state within the union. Thus the whole endless Macedonian question would finally be settled."
Quoted from H. G. Alsberg, "Union in the Balkans", Nation, CIX (Oct. 4, 1919), 463-64
[edit] Socialists
Were there also Balkan parties in the Socialist International after the Socialist/Communist split in the early twenties? I presume the precursors were members of the Second International, but this should be stated. Septentrionalis 02:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Article name
Should this be at Balkan Federation or Balkan Federation movement. Might be more suited, considering the numerous different names... - FrancisTyers · 22:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that the present title is highly unsatisfying; both the titles you propose seem good to me.--Aldux 23:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, as well. —Nightstallion (?) 22:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Question
Why does it say Macedonia seperately, when it already notes Greece, Yugoslavia and Bulgaria? --HolyRomanEmperor 20:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
