Talk:Bal Gangadhar Tilak
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (add comments) |
 |
This article is maintained by the Indian politics workgroup. |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group. | ||
[edit] New Edits
I don't have time to police and I certainly don't give a damn about people reverting these new edits, but they should NOT be reverted because (1) they are better organized and lucid, (2) they are not repetitive stuff.
Don't freak about an Anon adding these changes. As long as Wikipedia allows it, there is no problem with Anon work.
the dalit view on tilak section should ber emoved as it is biased and very offensive
NO.
Actually the Dalit section enhances the quality of the article as it puts Tilak in the proper perspective. It is the Brahmin class of India (I am also a Brahmin) to which Tilak belonged wants to project a false image of Tilak as a great progressive and a leader of all classes. In reality he was a Brahmin reactionary and a Hindu fundamentalist!
Let people know the entire personality of Tilak.
[edit] Problem with quote
There seems to be some problem with this text here, and it doesn't make sense: "However, English, which (Anant) Chaturdashi (in Aug/Sept span), which contributed for people to get together and celebrate the festival and provided a good platform for leaders to inspire masses. His call for boycott of foreign goods also served to inspire patriotism among Indian masses."--fredericknoronha 07:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
