User talk:Badmonkey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Contents

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rocna-Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rocna-Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Response from Rewih

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Garhauer (2nd). I have been accused of sockpuppetry and need some help please. I initially made an error in both using a user name that was the same as our product and submitting an article that looked like a promotion of our product. I had seen the Rocna anchor piece and without doing enough homework, assumed I could do the same. I took notice of the warnings and accepted that this was not the correct way of doing things. I understood that if I changed the user name to a more neutral one, this would solve the problem. Perhaps you could tell me what I should have done.

I also seek your advice as to how to deal with negative comments continually being added to the article on anchor weights. After more reading, it appears I can ask for some evidence that the comments are not biased. --Rewih (talk) 22:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Result of Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Garhauer (2nd)

I've decided that your allegation of sockpuppetry is probably correct, but Rewih will be given a second chance because all the other accounts are blocked. See User talk:Rewih. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Garhauer

I replied on my talk page. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 13:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)