User talk:Badharlick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

15:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)71.117.165.221Welcome to my talk page. If you would like to leave a message, please click "edit this page" and leave your message. Please remember to sign your comments, and be civil - I will endeavour to do the same for you.

I am trying to educate myself on shaft mining. We need to sink a 20 meter deep shaft through wet/sandy (lahar) soil. The shaft need only be around 3 meters in diameter. We will need sump pumps to control seepage. I am trying to learn the best way to sink a shaft under these conditions. Thank You, Ralph Soule geopotential@geopotential.biz.71.117.165.221 15:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Gen Y

Badharlick: I noted your comment on the "Generation Y" talkpage, and I wonder if you'd consider returning to the page to offer suggestions on the major edits I've made, since I agreed with much of your analysis. It is still largely speculative, but now acknowledges itself to be so. In reference to your frustration at the incongruities between US and UK groups going by the same name, I have added indications that since "generations" are theoretically bound to shared national events, no two countries really have analogous generational groups. I'm interested in possibly doing research on this generation for political marketing purposes, and I'd like to know if what I've written is capable of winning over a skeptic. --Biddy5637Sept 28, 2005


[edit] Transformer

Since your comment that the page was a bit difficult to understand ,we have changed and simplified it quite considerably. Would you now care to look at it again and offer any new comments on its talk page? Thanks.--Light current 02:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Steve Irwin - archive

I was an accidental archiving, as its normal to place new discussions at the end of talk pages I cut the upper section and archived. Gnangarra 12:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes I know about that. It was probably partly my fault for being lazy - I've devoleped the habit of just putting my comment at the top of the page rather than scrolling down to the bottom. I should probably get out of that. --Badharlick 12:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
sorry got it again, I'm off its 1am here, if the page needs another archive when i'm back on (approx 6 hours) i'll leave this one on the talk page Gnangarra 16:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] sorry

sorry bout wat happened on the George W. Bush page


[edit] WikiProject On Emo Music

Hey, I've noticed you contributed to Emo Music talk page with the paragraph about the difference between past and modern Emo, what is Emo and what isn't - I think this question is exactly the reason why wiki pages about bands in any way related to Emo (The Used, FATA, SOTY, Thrice, FFAF, FFTL etc) undergo severe editing in their genre paragraphs, and it becomes malice, when one second the band is Emo, another second it's something else. I've started WikiProject On Emo Music in order to improve those wikipedia articles. If you're interested in participating, please visit the Front Page of the project. Thanks. Iceness 09:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Heya! Thanks for updating the discussion page of the project I've started! Sorry couldn't get back at you at once, or get more work done on the project because I'm currently have my computer dead at home, and I'm glad that even with me being away the project is still running. Thanks. Iceness 09:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] China clay category

Your comments show that our interests coincide. I have been researching the mineral railways around St Austell for several years now, although I am currently focusing on the broad guage era. I envisage a Wiki article on the Cornwall Minerals Railway as the next stage, but I would also like to expand on the Par Harbour section in the main Par article (perhaps extracting it as a separate article) and want to post a lot more information on the history of Fowey as a port.

As for the new category, would just "Cornwall china clay" be the right name, or were you thinking of something with a different scope? Geof Sheppard 08:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

You replied: I was thinking "Cornish China Clay Mining" or "China Clay Mining in Cornwall" would be a good title for the main article ... and in that capacity the article would serve as the "origin" of the railway articles ... almost like a start page where users can follow the process from the pit to the railway to the port, or back the other way...
This sounds better to me, rather than a category. The Kaolinite article doesn't even mention Cornwall, so there is clearly a need to close this gap.
I was thinking that to coordinate our efforts we might want to start a wikiproject to perhaps encourage others to participate in areas needing attention?
I wonder if this is too small to be a project. How about creating the page and then inviting contributions through the Cornwall Wikiproject? Geof Sheppard 08:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Your latest ideas all seem sound. Let me know when you have posted the article so that I can work on it too, or if I can help in some other way. Geof Sheppard 13:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Al Qaeda

In my opinion you are absolutely right. However, there is a whole regiment over there of editors who feel the guidelines are saying different things than normalwise when it comes to these subjects.

I saw on your userpage that you like ships: my wife has lived on this ship: De Maria, for a few years.  — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 11:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Thx for upholding policy.  — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 10:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)