Talk:Ayodhya debate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (see comments) |
 |
This article is maintained by the Indian politics workgroup. |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Hinduism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
|
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
Hi Baka, I was just trying to improve the quality of the whole page than anything else. I realize somehow you are insistent on having the political fallout section. Well I am not particularly happy with it because it says some feel with out naming a source. Please provide a source or take that sentence back. I also feel that the Godhra incident is not relavent in a Ayodhya debate. Please give a justification for that here. Just because karsevaks were massacared doesnt mean that it needs a mention here. If that has to stay then the pre demolition shooting of karsevaks should also be included. Bye --Khammam 05:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I think I have given enough time for a response. As there was no response I am going ahead and removing the Godhra incident from this article--Khammam 05:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
According to the Hindu view, the ancient temple could have been destroyed on the orders of Mughal emperor Babur. This view is challenged by many Muslims and 'Marxist'.[4]
This is so obviously written by someone with a very definite bias..."marxist", lol. I'm editing this out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.180.126.144 (talk) 14:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
