Talk:Automorphic form

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article incorporates material from PlanetMath, which is licensed under the GFDL.

Mathematics Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics.
Mathematics rating:	Start Class	High Priority	Field: Number theory
Please update this rating as the article progresses, or if the rating is inaccurate. Click to show/hide comments. Please add to or update the comments to suggest improvements to the article. organisation needed. --Cronholm144 21:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Condition 2 isn't quite right, it seems. The analytic conditions are something like 'within a finite-dimensional space'.

Charles Matthews 21:37, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Clean up messages

A tagger slapped four different maintenance tags on this article and did not explain any of them. They were:

1. clean-up jargon,
2. notability,
3. in-universe, and
4. tone

Of these, the in-universe really makes no sense, unless it was meant as some kind of philosophical joke. After that, notability makes little sense, because this is a concept which has been thoroughly studied by mathematicians. I don't see tone applying here, but clean-up jargon is the only tag which I can see as kind of making sense for this article as it stands today.

But since the tagger failed to explain any of these, we could feel perfectly justified in removing all of them. PrimeFan 23:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Too much jargon!

I spent a term in a graduate course on automorphic forms and still didn't work out what they are. It is impossible to talk about them without jargon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.56.75 (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)