Talk:Australian Women's Weekly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portal	Australian Women's Weekly is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Vandalism

Hi Andypandy,

You have accused me of vandalising the wikipedia article 'Women's Weekly'. In my opinion my change added value to the article.

To give this some context, the article is about a magazine called the 'Women's Weekly' which is currently published every month. The casual observer would wonder why the magazine continues to be called 'Women's Weekly'. The explanation given within the article is weak: 'The Australian Women's Monthly just didn't have the same ring to it.'

In my opinion, I successfully clarified the reasoning with subtly and without vulgarity. This was done simply by linking 'Women's Monthly' to the article that describes the phenomenon of the human condition whose colloquial terminology shares this alternative magazine title.

This is not vandalism, but a clarifiant. Perhaps its subtlety was lost on you? I will re-instate the change, and if you would like to discuss further please do so on the discussion page.

Regards, 222.154.226.33 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 222.154.226.33 (talk • contribs).

I agree that adding the link to 'Women's Monthly' adds needed clarification to what is frankly a pretty tongue-in-cheek comment. Riverhead 09:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)