Talk:Australian Secret Intelligence Service

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Australian Secret Intelligence Service has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
May 1, 2006 Good article nominee Listed
Flag
Portal
 Australian Secret Intelligence Service is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments

Contents

[edit] Sheraton Hotel incident details

This article originally stated that in the 1983 Sheraton Hotel incident, the agents were arrested, and in an allegedly drunken state. I can't find any confirmation of that. Anyone have any? --K. 06:02, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

Hey - with the impending anti-terrorist legislation about to go through - are we allowed to write about such secret squirrel stuff or do we risk getting done for sedition? Do we have any martyrs out there? Being only one of two d'angelos living in Canberra, with the possibility of arab ancestors from around 1,000 years ago, I'm definitely keeping my head down low. I hereby formally state that I had nothing to do with this article and if I have said anything to offend anyone, I take it all back forthwith. ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 11:21, 26 November 2005 (UTC) ps this logo is used by the Western Bulldogs and does not carry any political intent or meaning - I promise - they are as squeaky white waspish as you can get despite the fact that the old Footscray West neighbourhood is about as multicultural as any place on Earth (to put it mildly) - so I beg all ASIS officers reading this page - don't take out your frustrations on the Bullies!!


It is unlikely that the Sunday Age could have disclosed the names following the incident, as it did not exist until 1989 (unless, of course, "following" means over 6 years later). So it was either a weekday or Saturday Age, or one of the former Sunday newspapers such as the Sunday Press. -- Pdwerryh 11:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References need restoration work

Once upon a time this article was very well referenced: [1] shows the last version where references were associated with specific facts. Then the references got "cleaned up", in the process dissociating them from the article text. This is going to be a bunch of hard work to restore since a years' worth of editing has gone on since then, I'm unlikely to get very far before heading off. So I'm leaving a note here on Talk: for others to pick up on. Bryan 06:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Actually, never mind - sorting out the old "Digest1" etc ref templates was easier than I'd feared, I think I'm done. Bryan 06:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Assessment completed for Australian Secret Intelligence Service


As per either a recent request at or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: article supplies a reasonable to good depth of knowledge

However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question.

ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the "Requesting an assessment section", and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 10:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


I thought the bugging of the Chinese Embassy happened in 94-95?????

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Asisgov.gif

Image:Asisgov.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hope Royal Commission

The National Archives of Australia has released the records of the Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security under the 30 year rule.[2] There is more than enough material to spin this off into a new article. 59.167.57.197 (talk) 08:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)