Talk:Aurora Jolie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Worthiness
While biography is an important part of wikipedia, I see no real reason why this is worthy to be in the main area of wikipedia. If anything, there should be a wikipedia for porn where such items of trivia or notoriety can accumulate. The discussion of specific pornographic sexual acts makes the entry NSFW, and therefore inappropriate. The entry, as it is, is almost enough to serve as a clue for a crossword puzzle. {Ema Zee (talk) 04:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)}
- Wikipedia serves as both a general purpose encyclopaedia and a specialist encyclopaedia, and has content appropriate for both. Wikipedia is not censored, and comes with an unambigious disclaimer on the subject. If one is concerned about safe for workness, they shouldn't read articles about pornographic actresses. WilyD 13:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Race
I hear many sources state she's mixed, i'd list them, but not now
but is she mulatto or black? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.105.219.97 (talk) 00:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Biography articles with listas parameter | Biography articles of living people | Actors and filmmakers work group articles | Stub-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles | Unknown-priority biography (actors and filmmakers) articles | Stub-Class biography articles | WikiProject Pornography articles | Start-Class Pornography articles | Low-importance Pornography articles | Start-Class Low-importance Pornography articles

