Talk:Augusto Monterroso
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Central America, which collaborates on articles related to Central America. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Stub?
I wouldn't want to override a decision while I don't know much about the article's topic, so I won't change, only ask:
Is there a specific reason that this isn't marked as a stub?
I'm sure Senior Monterroso didn't get all this recognition for one 1-sentence story, as interesting as its concept may be, but the lack of other information or expansion on other information creates the illussion that most of what that man has created was this one sentence.
Until someone expands on it, I believe it deserves a "stub" tag to avoid such confusion..
p.s. just an anecdote: Technically, since the whole story is one sentence, quoting the whole sentence isn't "fair use". But I believe Wikipedia will be forgiven for that ;-)
(i'm joking of course)
AilaG 22:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] shortest story
Is Monterroso's story really the shortest ever? Ernest Hemingway once wrote a story that read: "For sale: baby shoes, never worn." That's six words. See Flash fiction. Leo44 (talk) 22:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 10:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
