User talk:Ashley beauchamp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 January 2008 2 Speedy deletion of Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield 3 Speedy deletion of Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield 4 Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Byron Morrow, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Byron Morrow was changed by Ashley beauchamp (c) (t) deleting 7627 characters on 2008-01-09T17:25:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield

A tag has been placed on Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redmarkviolinist ^{Drop me a line} 17:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield

A tag has been placed on Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Paste (talk) 18:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield

I've removed the speedy deletion for your article Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield. I'm not familiar with the topic and your article seems to have been somewhat lengthy. However, the article is extremely un encyclopedic as at times it is written as an essay and there are a lot of opinions on your article. Please remember that in an encyclopedia, opinions are not expressed, since these differ from person to person.

However it seems you are on the right track to making an article. I will try to fix your article as much as I can, however note that it may be on a watchlist to be deleted if the article does not attain a more encyclopedic look in a week. Thanks! Monkeytheboy (talk) 18:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)