Talk:ASELSAN
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the the participants page if you would like to get involved. Happy editing! |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
 |
edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for ASELSAN: |
|---|---|
|
No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category |
|
[edit] F-16 IFF hack and the killing of three.
Added info on the three Aselsan engineers who were assasinated after they managed to open up the secret US-made codes for F-16 fighter plane IFF system. They are considered heros and martyrs in Turkey, they helped the country defend its souvereignity of the airspace. 82.131.210.162 09:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Please spare us of the conspiracy theories and your "martyrs", OK?
85.73.83.194 16:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
That F-16 thing is a story. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.179.137.124 (talk) 09:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
This F-16 thing is a big lie. Don't believe it. I am an employee in that corporation and I for sure know that this is bullshit. One of them left the corporation 7 years ago. One of the other two was a mechanical engineer. Come on. Mechanical. The other one was a programmer. They say he felt himself unsuccesful at gradute school. He apperantly had issues with his supervisor at school. These three were not a team, like those idiots claim. Don't let them fool you. (I feel sorry for all three.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.231.126.200 (talk) 19:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Removed the completely fictional, utter bullshit "F-16 IFF" story. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.181.251.9 (talk) 21:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
F-16 IFF story is unsourced and potentially harmful, as such its inclusion in wiki is inappropriate, until and unless it can be properly sourced. If someone feels strongly enough aboput this to revert its removal, source it. 11:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
