Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pig jig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How is this different from the following ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Folklife_Festival

It isn't, other than in being newly created. I've added an {{unreferenced}} tag to that article, and will put it up for deletion too if no references are forthcoming Mayalld (talk) 15:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

And in response to Mayllad's personal email to me, yes I did research Wikipedia and how it works and I don't understand how you thought that the sources that the student had put up there were improperly referenced. Perhaps you could enlighten everyone with what exactly was incorrect with his citations. --Folk smith (talk) 15:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Just to be COMPLETELY clear at this point. I have NOT sent a personal e-mail. I have sent a message on his talk page. Clearly you haven't researched thoroughly enough. If you had, you would have read and understood WP:V and WP:RS. If you had read and understood those documents, you wouldn't need to ask what was wrong with the citations. Mayalld (talk) 15:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, why didn't you post that on this discussion page? Is anyone looking at my "talk" page? No. I don't think that they are. Well, I've had my student repost his secondary sources. I hope they are to your liking. I would also like to add that by not including primary sources you are greatly limiting good information about important subjects. As you have noted that you "don't care" who I am or my title, I should remind you that the secondary sources that you covet so much are written by folks like me - if my position as a professional, degreed scholar doesn't matter to you, why should the articles written by my colleagues matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Folk smith (talk • contribs) 15:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)