Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Claudia Ciesla
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I believe this page should not be deleted. Claudia is not associated with porn sites. This is the action of someone who is jealous or hates her.
It says by Ca woodcock:
Delete Of the six references, three are in German (only one of which is a website anyway), one is porno web-site, one is her own blog, and one is her own personal web-site Ca woodcock 23:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
This is a lie and slander! Claudia Ciesla was never associated with any porn site !! This is the action of Germans (he/she writes PORNO - which is German) who is jealous or hates her.
[edit] Do not delete
This article contains many good references about this female. Nothing is in here is slanderous or a lie so why does anyone even bother to try a delete? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.183.7.169 (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I know Claudia for long times now. She is absolutly not into adult industry. She is just a nice beautiful and great woman who want to be in model industry, and work really hard for that. You don't have to delete her page just because some jealous people said lying about Claudia. You can check all her link, and you will see that there is absolutly no porn in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Didysik (talk • contribs) 06:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I am amazed at the efforts some people will go to to harass someone who is not only popular, but very well known in the US as well as overseas. Like it or not, Claudia is a real live model who is expanding her portfolio rapidly to include acting and singing as well as modeling. Her status may not be a Heidi Klum just yet, but then in my opinion one has to have a taste for someone like Heidi Klum to appreciate degrees of status in the modeling world. I personally don't place Ms. Klum very high up the food chain, as other appear to do. Having read all the postings, there is an obvious attempt by a minority of people to harass and besmirch this beautiful young lady's reputation and accomplishments. And this from people who hold everyone else to such high standards seemingly can't even craft an entire sentence without glaring errors. Give the lady a break, and leave her page alone and in Wiki where it belongs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbgrandy (talk • contribs) 13:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

