Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"weapons free"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was transwiki to wiktionary. the " versions were deleted since the others had better names and the content was duplicated. - Bobet 08:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "weapons free", "weapons hold", "weapons tight", Weapons free, Weapons hold, Weapons tight

Nominated for speedy delete as dicdef, but that's not a recognised speedy criterion. So they come here instead. ➨ ЯEDVERS 10:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Transwiki to wiktionary. Yomangani 11:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to wiktionary as above Ruaraidh-dobson 11:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki free, fire at will per above. --DarkAudit 14:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki with extreme prejudice to Wiktionary per above. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 16:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a slang and idiom guide. Travislangley 21:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki if wikitionary wants it, but delete, anyway. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 00:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep, possibley merge into single article about anti-aircraft terminology. --Yunipo 09:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to wiktionary. --Zoz (t) 17:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Please add a notice that this information is coming from Dtic (in example, http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/natoterm/w/01164.html). -- ReyBrujo 13:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki dicdef Mallanox 23:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.