Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"GMT Watch"

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, renaming to GMT Watch per discussion. Arkyan • (talk) 20:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "GMT Watch"

"GMT Watch" (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Doesn't assert notability, doesn't cite any sources. Delete Empyrycal 05:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep well known type of watch - most major manufacturers produce them. Needs to be moved to GMT Watch per naming conventions. EliminatorJR Talk 10:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I think this is a real term in the... watch industry, or whatever it's called. [1] shows this seems to be a feature some people really want in watches, and the term is commonly used. But get rid of the quotation marks in the title. --W.marsh 13:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep but develop and source - gotta respect Zulu time. --Mary quite contrary (hai?) 16:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep the page is very new (2 days old) to be deleted for lack of sources. Needs to be sourced though. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 17:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy redirect to the existing article, 24 hour watch. (Which should probably itself be renamed to 24-hour watch, but maybe there's a good reason not to.) --Quuxplusone 02:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: as per notability of the subject, which may not be asserted. A source should not be difficult to find. I also like Quux.'s idea of speedy redirect to 24 hour watch, of course, given that the creator of this article would not disagree that the GMT Watch is essentially a " 24 hour watch " . Jamesowen237 13:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep but if it is not redirected, at least move it to a title without the quotation marks. SGGH 10:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.