Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhai Zhenhua

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Arguments for delete outweigh 2 keep votes that didn't really defend this subjects notability, and one that only weakly did. —Cleared as filed. 04:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zhai Zhenhua

delete her only notable claim is writing her autobiography which is only gets 230 total hits on a (American) yahoo search Mayumashu 07:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep She was a Red Guard who saw the light and escaped to the capitalist world. Ruby 08:17, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
    • translation: "She was a traitor to the revolution who succumbed to imperialist propaganda". Please try to maintain a NPOV... (no vote) Grutness...wha? 23:32, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep borderline notability; book is still for sale at Amazon, three reviews. OhNoitsJamieTalk 08:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Three reviews on Amazon is flatlining. Metta Bubble 15:23, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete simply not notable enough to warrant encycopedic treatment. Eusebeus 15:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 19:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless some rather more tangible claim to notability can be found Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 21:22, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn author, her book is ranked 676,763 on amazon.com. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  • keep - The cultural revolution was important, affected 1 billion people. It remains important, and poorly documented. We need to remember that the wikipedia is an International effort, not a purely USAian effort. The wikipedia should not selectively cover USA topics in greater detail than it covers topics from other nations. -- Geo Swan 17:54, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
    • I agree that the Cultural Revolution was important, but every Red Guard does not rate an article. This article does nothing to improve our understanding of Chinese culture, but is merely vanity. User:Zoe|(talk) 17:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.