Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeptasia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zeptasia

Non-notable form of music synthesising with three Google hits. PROD removed with addition of large picture. --Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 00:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as it probably fails WP:MUSIC. It also reads like an advertisement. Ryūlóng 00:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC).

• Comment it's not an advertisement it's the start of an entry that hasn't been allowed the chance to be just like the dark side of the rainbow entry —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zeptasia (talk • contribs) 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per Ryulong. --digital_me^{(Talk•Contribs)} 01:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — fails everything I can think of but am tired of typing out. SynergeticMaggot 01:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, the first page is... Myspace. Ugh. Fails WP:V, among other things. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per Ryūlóng; unremarkable. --Bakanov (talk • contribs) 12:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NCurse _work 14:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep A great page about an established technique. I support it 110% which means I could backtrack 10% and still be 100% behind it. -- Bpazolli 16:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Thing is, Dark side of the rainbow is classic stoner's watching material, and has such similarities that it's as if the entire album was deliberately mixed to produce the effect. It also, more importantly has references. This does not. LinaMishima 20:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Ryūlóng. — Reinyday, 22:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

yeah dark side of the rainbow doesn't even come close to this sync and there are more similarities in the lyrics, timing, and presence, and who said "stoner's watching material" isn't relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.19.58 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.