Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zanox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ---J.S ^(T/C) 04:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zanox

Zanox (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Not exactly a very large company with only 230 employees. Badly written page with no sources or references Debaser23 11:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as spam. May be speediable. MER-C 12:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment - I'm not sure whether it can be classed as spam really because the company does in fact exist (it turns up a few Google searchs), its just that I really see this company as non notable. They haven't really put anything into world and have no historical significance. Debaser23 12:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree with that, but I'm putting out an additional reason for deletion. It's just a deletable corporate profile you'd expect to see in a press release. MER-C 13:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I do not think it is just a spam, but in this case it misses notability. Fact that company has 230 emplyees only does not give less notability (Lagerfeld is one man only). But this company does not seem to produce notable product. So I vote delete this article. Tulkolahten^talk 12:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - 1.) The article makes NO assertion of why it is notable. 2.) The article is poorly written with little information that would be useful to anybody not looking to hire this company. 3.)Does not say it is industry leader or anything so I think it fails WP:CORP. Delete it I say! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:CORP and no references to show notability. Jayden54 13:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:CORP as stated above. NeoJustin 21:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.