Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Z-movie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep.  Grue  19:48, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Z-movie

Neologism, no relevant google hits except the page itself Tom k&e 6 July 2005 16:37 (UTC)

  • That's not true. I heard it used on Teen Jeopardy! once, a while ago, and I say keep. -Litefantastic 6 July 2005 16:40 (UTC)
  • Keep. I've used this term from time to time myself (and I assure you, I could not possibly qualify for Teen Jeopardy! if I wanted to). Fernando Rizo 6 July 2005 16:59 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Exploitation film. This term is in use, but it's basically a pejorative term for a low-budget exploitation flick. — Gwalla | Talk 6 July 2005 18:24 (UTC)
  • Merge explanation of term and redirect to B-movie. --Tabor 7 July 2005 00:17 (UTC)
  • Either keep or merge with B-movie (and perhaps Exploitation film).
  • Keep I know this term and heard a professor use the term a few times. Its notable enough to merit entry
  • Keep Although it is more of a definition than an encyclopedic entry. Maybe Move to wikitionary? I don't believe it is the same as an Exploitation film. Who is Plan 9 from Outer Space exploiting? Vampires? UnHoly 01:33, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: An exploitation film doesn't necessarily exploit anyone (except maybe the audience). It's synonymous with "grindhouse film": the sort of movies shown in cheap, disreputable theaters or drive-ins, usually with very short runs (one book I own on exploitation flicks is titled "For One Week Only"); mostly cheap independent productions with few, if any, aspirations towards anything beyond making a buck. Many of the better-known are now considered "cult" movies. Practically every movie Roger Corman or William Castle ever made was an exploitationer. Most exploitationers made now are direct-to-video. — Gwalla | Talk 03:17, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.