Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You're Gonna Get It!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Nomination was withdrawn. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 21:20, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You're Gonna Get It!

Delete as vanity album. SYCTHOStalk 01:16, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Speedy keep (nomination withdrew) with expansion. At the time of nomination, I only saw an unorganized track list ([1]) and assumed it was vanity. SYCTHOStalk 21:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Yes I think this is a track list for an album...? Draeco 01:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. *drew 01:34, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand -- This Tom Petty album hit #23 in 1978. I don't think it's a vanity addition. --Allen 01:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand -- I'm partial to album articles. More information should be added, such as history or events, if applicable. IMO, of course Kareeser|Talk! 02:14, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep You young whippersnappers never heard of Tom Petty? Ruby 02:20, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment — Obviously not =) Kareeser|Talk! 02:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Its not Vanity, its Tom Petty & the Heartbreakers.--Ezeu 02:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep notable group, notable album.--Alhutch 04:55, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, even *I've* heard of Tom Petty... Grandmasterka 06:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep deleting this would be petty and heartbreaking. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 15:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I propose that User:JZG be deleted and moved to BJAODN! --kingboyk 20:52, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand' - otherwise Tom won't come around here no more. --Aaron 15:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep Very strange nomination. --kingboyk 20:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC) Comment struck out about nomination as per Sycthos' comments at withdrawal. --kingboyk 21:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.