Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YADD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:36, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] YADD

The term seems to be little-known, and the issue is better covered in the digg article Lurker 12:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Agreed on this article's deletion. Throw it down the memoryhole. (Raymondangel 05:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC))
• Delete. Notable material has been migrated to Digg#Duplicate Articles, and judging by the discussion at Talk:Digg#YADD, the term is not notable even within the Digg community. --Muchness 12:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I've been using Digg nearly since Day 1, and i've never even seen this term. Not to say it's never been used, but it must not be that notable. Psykus 06:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I haven't ever seen this used. Even if it is used on digg, it isn't notable enough for an article.--SirNuke 23:12, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Been using Digg for quite some time and I also haven't seen this term. If its going to be anywhere, it should be in the Digg article, it doesn't warrant its own.--Hergio 23:57, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete As above. Never heard of the term myself and I am a frequent user of Digg. --13:12, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NOT urbandictionary. Paul 18:16, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Stifle 01:32, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.