The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per a7; non-notable (non-existent) website.— OcatecirT 01:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
It's dubious the former domain name for a website is notable; even if it was the WTC's. But at this moment, it is held by a squatter and having a link to it (or publicizing it at all beyond, maybe, a reference (not a link) in the WTC article) is very much inappropriate. — Coren(talk) 01:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.