Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrathful Dispersion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Speedily deleted - creator's request. - Mike Rosoft 10:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wrathful Dispersion

Wrathful Dispersion (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not even try to establish notability, and has been tagged as such for a while with no improvement. Based upon highly neologistic nature of topic and complete obscurity I cannot image any possible argument that would make the article worthy of being in an encyclopedia. Looks like it was added out of vanity. DreamGuy 00:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

I added it because it was requested. Nevertheless, I support its deletion. --Ptcamn 00:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Ptcamn is the article creator and the only actual editor. Others have added tags (including this AFD) but not actually changed any of the article text. Can't this be speedy deleted as G7, since "the page's only substantial content was added by its author" and he requested deletion above? *** Crotalus *** 00:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

I was just going to suggest speedy, yeah. DreamGuy 00:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

• It seems to have been inspired by the Bible story of the Tower of Babel. Anthony Appleyard 06:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Ayup. You voting, or you just here to state the obvious? DreamGuy 06:45, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.