Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worms: Ultimate Destruction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete despite user:Minopas saying that deleting it makes us stupid. DS (talk) 14:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Worms: Ultimate Destruction

Gives the appearance of a hoax, no sources, probably speculative. Delete per WP:NOT. TeaDrinker (talk) 20:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete not true, however there is a PC worms game in production. (Shadowmoon13 (talk) 21:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC))

I think this should be kept. It is 100% true! (Minopas (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC))

  • Delete as a violation of WP:CBALL, at best. At worst, hoax; only supposed source is a member-only forum. GlassCobra 21:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Anyone who is saying delete it, stop it. (Minopas (talk) 21:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC))

Please leave this article alone. I am new here, and all i want to do is be cool. (Minopas (talk) 21:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC))

  • KnowledgeOfSelf looks into his crystal ball and sees a delete in the making KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 21:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete : completely unverifiable per WP:V and possible hoax. Mh29255 (talk) 21:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete junk. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as well given the major WP:V problems. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as unverifiable. Say, KnowledgeOfSelf, can you dredge up some lottery numbers in that thing for me? Tony Fox (arf!) 21:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • You'll have to pay me one hundred billion zillion dollars, to get em out of me. ;) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 21:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Anyone who thinks this should be deleted is stupid. (Minopas (talk) 07:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC))
  • Comment Closest thing i can find to this article is this (Shadowmoon13 (talk) 09:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC))
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.