Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woe betide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:40, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Woe betide

Vocab stub. Transwiki to wiktionary. ∴ here…♠ 21:36, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

copied relevant to wikt:woe_betide . ∴ here…♠ 22:03, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, obviously. More than a dicdef is already in the article. Encyclopedias carry information about things, and this article (that might not even be a stub, it might just be a short article) certainly has information about "Woe betide" that is not suitable for Wiktionary. -Splash^talk 02:09, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Doesn't look like an obvious keep to me... Kappa 02:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep. It is a (marginally) notable phrase, and the entry has more than a dictionary definition. *Dan T.* 15:20, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep per Dan T. Stifle 19:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.