This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.Woohookitty 15:45, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic. Copy vio too? PhilipO 23:03, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
haven't been able to find a copyvio source, but definetly looks copy vio, but delete. Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 23:06, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
Delete - I'm sure it's a copyvio, but whatever - it's also totally unencyclopedic. CDC(talk) 23:21, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
Delete not encyclopedic. JamesBurns 08:37, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.