Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Miller (architect)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] William Miller (architect)

William Miller (architect) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Was listed as a candidate for speedy deletion. I do not agree that this article is CSD, since notability has been asserted. May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 10:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 09:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

• Userfy or Delete in the absence of reliable sources (not the subject himself) which assert notability. — Athænara ✉ 16:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete because there's no assertion of notability. Jehochman (^Talk/_Contrib) 17:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No sources whatever. An architect who puts up big buildings should be able to locate some press coverage. As it stands, this article is a resume or an advertisement. Notability can't be shown on this data. Posting your own biography violates WP:AUTO and WP:COI. EdJohnston 23:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. only source is his own website. Claims cannot be substaniated, and appear to be false. Rimmeraj 01:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete does not meet notability requirements of WP:BIO (independent published work).Garrie 02:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.