Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Keleher
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] William Keleher
Non-notable per WP:BIO. Attempts to assert notability so probably not suitable for speedy. Also note original author [1]. Kafziel Talk 17:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - Not-notable, but just barely. Based on the history, I gather the ghost of William Keleher penned the entry. This violates WP:Supernatural. -bobby 18:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ha ha ha :) I know the guy is dead; I was just pointing out that it's a single-purpose account with a disproportionate interest in the topic. Guess I could have been clearer. Kafziel Talk 18:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - I figured as much but couldn't resist the cheap shot. -bobby 18:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ha ha ha :) I know the guy is dead; I was just pointing out that it's a single-purpose account with a disproportionate interest in the topic. Guess I could have been clearer. Kafziel Talk 18:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete If there's evidence of things that this lawyer did to change the history of the laws in New Mexico during his law practice-- important precedents, etc., that would sway me in the "Weak Keep" direction. William A. Keleher is dead. But Wikipedia may be haunted by William B. Keleher, his son. OfficeGirl 00:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete or maybe by Mary Ann Keleher Rogers, his daughter.
- Wow, that blog you have referenced has some material that makes it look as though a brief but well-written and well-sourced encyclopedia article about this fellow would be just fine and that it could be done without too much agony. Where did the creator of this article go? Giving up so soon? OfficeGirl 00:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
