Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikisource

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY KEEP and admonish nominator. Nick 20:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Funpika should not be admonished for a good-faith nomination. (messedrocker • talk) 23:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikisource

Wikisource (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article fails Wikipedia:Notability (web). I attempted to find something to show that the article is notable and found nothing (a few hours after placing {{Notability}} on the page). If someone brings up something to show that this article is notable I will withdraw the nomination. Please don't use the "Its a Wikimedia project!" argument. Articles about non-notable websites should be deleted, even if the website is a Wikimedia project. Funpika 18:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

  • It's not relevant whether the article is about a Wikimedia project; your nomination says it all. For notability of the subject, see the previous nomination. Such jokes seem to be common. --B. Wolterding 19:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • You still don't appear to be assuming good faith here. Funpika 19:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - At the moment, I don't have an opinion. However, I would like to say that here is a situation where WP:ALLORNOTHING might come up. So remember not to use that line. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 19:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
"If you are referring to "Its a Wikimedia project!" then all I mean by that is that being a Wikimedia project doesn't automatically make something notable. Funpika 19:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
If you were refering to me, then you missed my point. I was talking to those who would say, keep. WP:ALLORNOTHING, basically says an argument to avoid is, "Well if we can't have a wikisource article, then there should not be a wikiquote article." --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 19:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.