Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Zionist Cabal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:TINC. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Zionist Cabal

Wikipedia Zionist Cabal (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

I fear this is not a particularly notable cabal. No reliable sources appear to refer to this cabal, raising concerns of verifiability and original research. And everyone knows the only cabal here is the immortal reptilian humanoid Illuminati USEBACA overlords. And we they will tolerate no other cabals here! Weregerbil 10:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete obviously per WP:SELF. JuJube 11:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete We all know that Wikipedia is truly controlled by the Wikans. Kyaa the Catlord 11:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I thought it was controlled by many different rival cabals that, as with gangs, only meet a few times per year (Wikimanias). In all seriousness, this is non-notable, contains no reliable sources, and is incredibly self-referential. -- Kicking222 13:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment can this be redirected to WP:CABAL or are there namespace issues? WilyD 15:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Shatner's behind it all. Seriously, non-notable, unverifiable, no reliable sources, original research... --Charlene 15:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete As per Charlene above —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chill doubt (talk • contribs) 15:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC).
• Speedy delete hardly worth discussing. per nom. Akihabara 15:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Under what criterion? --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I agree with Akihabara, this is not even worth discussing. GabrielF 16:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:N, WP:V, WP:OR, WP:SELF. Merely notable cabal with two blog posts as references. Michaelas10 (Talk) 17:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete--Rudjek 19:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete nonsense.--Jersey Devil 20:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NEO and WP:RS. Dragomiloff 21:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete We can't risk letting the secret out even for a secerr, I mean... NONSENSE. --tjstrf talk
• Delete per above. Tom Harrison ^Talk 23:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as the subject is not verifiable through reliable sources. Yamaguchi先生 03:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Oy vey! How did this article get past? VegaDark 07:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, the Wikipedia Homosexual Agenda Coalition doesn't allow any competition anyway, so we might as well as delete both before this turns into a gang war. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 11:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.