Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vortex Healing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vortex Healing

Vortex_Healing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) -- (View AfD)

I was the one who proposed deleting this article; wasn't logged in.

It appears that the article refers to a little-known pseudoscientific practice whose only known practitioner is a particular business. This makes it not really worth including, and a form of advertising despite the skeptical text. What say you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kris Schnee (talk • contribs) 06:52, 12 January 2007

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep, looks to be pretty popular among the sorts of people who would believe this sort of thing. Lots of google hits and even a feature article from no less an authority than Yoga Magazine. Recury 17:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • delete I often support keeping this sort of thing, but this particular exemplar is too nonsensical even for me. If kept, first step would be to stubbify the article. DGG 22:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I agree with DGG, this article needs to either be deleted entirely or stubbified and then rebuilt. If it is so popular that there is a feature article on it from Yoga Magazine, why is the Wiki article not much more than a regurgitated version of the Vortex Healing business' webpage? Arcticwoman 22:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above... Addhoc 23:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.