Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice Changer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all four. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 11:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Voice Changer, Voice Changer Software, AV voice changer software, Music Morpher

Delete this quartet of advertisements. Originally and arguably still copyvio from http://www.audio4fun.com and other pages within, the several redlinked editors to these two articles and AV Voice Changer Software, already speedied, are clearly just promoting their software (one editor is even User:Voicechanger); they all only edit these articles, and on Talk:Voice Changer speak of "we". Note that if you follow that link, the two terms in the titles of these articles are names of products on their website. I tried PRODding the first two, with predictably little success.

The articles start of sounding genuine but quickly come to discuss clearly proprietary questions in enthusiastic language. I do not think this walled garden of articles should be cleaned up: WP:NOT for advertising, at any level whatsoever, and these should be deleted to make that abundantly clear. -Splash^talk 12:52, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

• I've had some interaction with the creator, but none of the concerns I raised have been addressed. I don't expect that they will be, and if they are, I can then change my opinion from Strong Delete all per combinations of WP:SOFTWARE, WP:COPYVIO, WP:NOT and simple spamvertising. Colonel Tom 13:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per above.--Hooperbloob 14:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete AV voice changer software & Music Morpher as blatent advertising of non-notable software. Merge anything salvageable from Voice Changer Software to Voice Changer. Edit (and I will do this if it survives AfD) Voice Changer to strip out list of vendors, etc so it is an actual encyclopedic article and then monitor against further adspamming in the article.--Isotope23 17:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
  • But "Voice Changer" is not a thing, it's just a name for a piece of software. We already have a lengthy featured article on Speech synthesis and these articles provide no additional useful information because they are so keen to promote themselves and do so in a simple quick-fire factoid manner. -Splash^talk 18:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all: non-notable software spam. --Hetar 17:52, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all: per nom. Golfcam 04:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Merecat 06:12, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Move and improve: this is a notable topic (alterations to vocal sounds) however you're right... these articles are too commercial.--Keycard ^(talk) 08:24, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • We have a featured article already: Speech synthesis. There's no need to pollute that article with these pieces of astroturf. -Splash^talk 12:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all: Don't think it can be salvaged. Sohum 00:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.