Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. --Phroziac^(talk) 00:05, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Virtz

Hoax/Personal essay--Shanel 02:13, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

• I'd say original research, too, if it wasn't Patent Nonsense. Speedy and BJAODN --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:22, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• CSD as patent nonsense. --Apyule 03:08, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, if not Speedy. Nonsense ♠DanMS 03:47, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, patent nonsense. >: Roby Wayne ^{Talk • Hist} 04:01, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Maintain Further researches are going on.User:ChairLady 05:02, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy, perhaps BJAODN. Nonsense. - Andre Engels 11:39, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Tagged as Speedy... patent nonsense--Isotope23 20:32, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.