Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidyamandir classes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 05:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vidyamandir classes

Vidyamandir classes (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Completely unreferenced, highly POV/brochure style content, bordering blatant advertising and promotion. No source to establish notability beyond a claim to high performance of students. Second AfD nomination, disputed prod, declined CSD due to previous AfD (no result). Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 19:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - G11, it might border spam, but if it does it's from the wrong side of the line. — Coren ^(talk) 20:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - WP:SPAM. -- Hot Dog Wolf Bark! 20:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, would have been speedy as G11, except passed a previous afd, so WP:DP says not to. How could it have survived? from the closure: "no consensus... taking into account the two keep comments from people with no edits this afd/the article." I hope we'll have consensus now. no objection to W:SNOW. DGG (talk) 22:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

no prejudice to writing a sourced article with appropriate contentDGG (talk) 22:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as spam. Bearian 23:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.